音乐会评论 2019-10-18 / 11 分钟

英国国家歌剧院——哈里森·伯特威斯尔的《奥菲欧的面具》——彼得·霍尔、玛尔塔·丰塔纳尔斯-西蒙斯和詹姆斯·克莱弗顿主演;丹尼尔·克雷默执导;马丁·布拉宾斯指挥

Thirty three years since it was premiered by English National Opera, Sir Harrison Birtwistle’s The Mark of Orpheus returns as the third instalment of the same company’s series of operas this season concerned with the myth of Orpheus. Judging from the reactions of the audience, the work has lost none of its power over that time to bemuse, intrigue, provoke, and exhilarate. It famously adopts a non-linear approach to the original myth in diffracting it in three versions, through the various episodes which intersect or overlap each other (rather than given in sequence) in their presentation of the three central figures – Orpheus, Eurydice, and the interloper Aristaeus – as mortal humans, as heroes, and as myth, rather as a Cubist painting or sculpture reveals different planes of an object at once.

# 音乐会评论 # 柯蒂斯·罗杰斯
英国国家歌剧院——哈里森·伯特威斯尔的《奥菲欧的面具》——彼得·霍尔、玛尔塔·丰塔纳尔斯-西蒙斯和詹姆斯·克莱弗顿主演;丹尼尔·克雷默执导;马丁·布拉宾斯指挥
Thirty three years since it was premiered by English National Opera, Sir Harrison Birtwistle’s The Mark of Orpheus returns as the third instalment of the same company’s series of operas this season concerned with the myth of Orpheus. Judging from the reactions of the audience, the work has lost none of its power over that time to bemuse, intrigue, provoke, and exhilarate. It famously adopts a non-linear approach to the original myth in diffracting it in three versions, through the various episodes which intersect or overlap each other (rather than given in sequence) in their presentation of the three central figures – Orpheus, Eurydice, and the interloper Aristaeus – as mortal humans, as heroes, and as myth, rather as a Cubist painting or sculpture reveals different planes of an object at once.
For all the choreographic virtuosity and exuberance of David Kramer’s new production – with Barnaby Booth’s contributions, and Daniel Lismore’s remarkable and memorable costumes – it presents those threefold dimensions in a rather muddled way. In failing to delineate them more clearly, the originality of Sir Harrison’s and his librettist Peter Zinovieff’s conception is rather obscured. Instead, the vividness of the staging and costumes – a fancy dress party – becomes the main event, in their kitsch and flashy manner (a crystal-encrusted skull, a la Damien Hirst appears at the end, representing the dead Orpheus, at least as the receptacle of historical memory), detracting from the opera’s engagement with the notion of memory and identity in the myth. As a result it takes on something of the ironic, satirical, or sardonic slant on metaphysics and myth as encountered in Ligeti’s Le Grand Macabre or Stockhausen’s Licht cycle, but the score and libretto suggest something more serious and earnest. While it is true that a composer or a producer may adapt a well-known story or myth because the audience can reasonably be assumed to be familiar with its bare outlines – the very reason that Peri, Caccini, and Monteverdi set the Orpheus story right at the outset of operatic history – the choreographic incoherence of this production does not squarely elucidate or develop the multi-faceted components of the composer’s vision, still less the original myth.
The interludes (or ‘passing clouds of abandon’ and ‘allegorical flowers of reason’ as they are styled) which reference other parallel myths dealing with love and loss (for example Venus and Adonis, and Apollo and Hyacinthus) are better handled in being enacted through dance and mime in a glass box which shifts across the stage at appropriate times, making suggestive points about the connection between sex, violence, and death. The non-musical part of Orpheus and Eurydice the Heroes are also lyrically realised as a circus or aerial act, with its often air-borne character creating a sense of corporeal freedom in counterpoint to their characters’ earth-bound and suffering forms, and the well-built figure of Matthew Smith certainly offers a heroic visual representation of Orpheus as a human.
Underpinning the busy stagecraft, Sir Harrison’s score remains one of the monuments of modern opera. Here it is masterfully interpreted by Martyn Brabbins as he integrates the shimmering, urgent colours executed by the live ENO orchestra playing in the Coliseum, with the pre-recorded electronic soundscape that is a more or less continuous sonic presence (a more felicitous parallel with Stockhausen, although it happens to have been created at the Parisian Institut de Recherche et Coordination Acoustique/Musique). Together with the singing on the stage, those three musical dimensions register here both as distinct in their own right, but also as absolutely essential to each other, just as three lines, jointly and severally, comprise a triangle (the figure of three is fundamental to the construction of this work).
Peter Hoare gives an outstanding performance as Orpheus the Man, characterising his unsettled and grief-wracked mortal nature with complete vocal conviction, in music that is often raw and jagged, but equally also blossoms into a Brittenesque melodiousness at times. Marta Fontanals-Simmons sings with a correspondingly plangent quality as his counterpart, Eurydice the Woman. Other singers are more discreetly committed to their roles which are rarely sustained vocally for long. Claron McFadden deserves particular credit for the shrieking excitability of her lines as Hecate (a shadowy deity of the underworld, represented here with an especially striking costume) like a post-Modern re-imagining of Baroque coloratura.
Despite the shortcomings of the production (which often enthral and infuriate in equal measure), the consistency and sincerity of the performance overall demonstrates that The Mask of Orpheus constitutes one of the major advances in the development of music drama as a Gesamtkunstwerk since Wagner. Whatever one thinks about the staging (and execution is certainly slick, even if the conception is not) indifference is surely the last response it would provoke in anyone.
Further performances to 13 November
www.eno.org
最新资讯

更多资讯

查看全部资讯
蒂恰蒂指挥库勒沃。照片:大卫·古特曼
音乐会评论 2026-03-25

蒂恰蒂指挥库勒沃。照片:大卫·古特曼

宣传语不仅承诺呈现“原汁原味的西贝柳斯”,还称其为“芬兰当代最具原创性的年轻声音之一”。人们不禁好奇,洛塔·温纳科斯基(Lotta Wennäkoski)听到这样的评价是感到荣幸还是不悦。这位年过五十的成熟音乐家,曾为2017年逍遥音乐会最后一晚创作了一首令人惊艳的迷你序曲《褶边》(Flounce)。这首作品随后被收录在一张个人作曲家管弦乐专辑中,并最终荣获留声机奖。

库尔特·魏尔——马哈戈尼城的兴衰
音乐会评论 2026-02-16

库尔特·魏尔——马哈戈尼城的兴衰

他的新作 在缓慢的开场之后,逐渐展现出类似的原始能量。除了营造出一种工业废墟般的氛围之外,几乎没有其他布景,一个充满无限可能的世界正等待着被倾泻而出。一个巧妙的构思是,三位主角乘坐一辆集装箱卡车抵达,卡车随后卸下人员和道具,同时也容纳了更为私密的场景。我们并非置身于20世纪20年代的柏林或狂野的西部,而是一个色彩艳丽、极尽夸张的当代世界。正如当代对抗性社会主义艺术作品中常见的情况一样,焦点逐渐滑向了非政治的虚无主义。既然我们已经把世界糟蹋得不成样子,谁还需要飓风的帮助?没钱比谋杀更可怕。但为什么会这样呢?曼顿摒弃了辩证法,转而依靠令人难忘的视觉效果来填充剧院的广阔空间,呈现出一场阴郁的巡游。标语横幅毫无意义,而即将到来的台风却仅用一盏摇曳的灯笼和一位踢踏舞者(亚当·泰勒,莉齐·吉编舞)就生动地展现出来。不出所料,布莱希特笔下的性工作者不再全是女性,绞刑架也被电椅取代。一些解说员从通常供观众使用的包厢里发出声音。灯光设计至关重要,有时甚至达到了精妙绝伦的效果。

照片:大卫·古特曼
音乐会评论 2026-02-07

照片:大卫·古特曼

指挥简短的致辞,解释了中场休息时间与印刷节目单上所列时间不同,同时也引出了维捷斯拉娃·卡普拉洛娃(1915-1940)的作品。作为马蒂努的学生(甚至更多),她的音乐同样繁复而躁动,但却难以令人信服地展现出,如果她没有英年早逝,或许会成为上世纪的一位杰出作曲家。至少今晚的演出给人的感觉是喜忧参半。《 乡村组曲》 原本充满活力和色彩,却因乐曲的跳跃性而显得有些失衡,其中穿插着对 《彼得鲁什卡》 和 《大海》的回忆,以及更为明显的民间音乐元素(巴托克式的?),争夺着主导地位。雅纳切克式的“军事”风格最为突出(卡普拉洛娃此前曾创作过自己的 《军事小交响曲》)。 组曲的慢乐章,起初让人联想到英国田园诗和斯美塔那,但持续时间过长。后来,卡普拉洛娃的《 挥手告别》 ——一首篇幅较长的管弦乐歌曲,带有浓郁的晚期浪漫主义氛围,令人想起科恩戈尔德——被安排在幕间休息前演出。这些差异是否注定会成为卡普拉洛娃风格的一部分?它们是否正是其风格的精髓所在?我们永远不得而知。

照片:大卫·古特曼
音乐会评论 2026-02-04

照片:大卫·古特曼

伦敦爱乐乐团本乐季的两场音乐会巧妙地联系在一起,这种营销策略虽然在地理位置上有些牵强,但却十分精妙。这是第一场:四首来自中欧和东欧的20世纪作品,用流行音乐来类比的话,这些作品近年来又重新流行起来。

照片:大卫·古特曼
音乐会评论 2026-02-03

照片:大卫·古特曼

皇家爱乐乐团近来势头强劲,尽管演出中不时传来一些杂音:支气管咳嗽声、手机铃声、空调的嗡嗡声,以及偶尔掉落的玻璃杯,但演奏者和观众的热情依然溢于言表。佩特连科以他一贯用略带口音的英语进行的一番精心准备的背景介绍开场,这口音听起来颇为可爱,就像乔治·索尔蒂爵士一样,似乎并未受到长期居住在英国的影响。今晚的演出最终传递的信息,是在当下黑暗中带来希望。

照片:大卫·古特曼
音乐会评论 2026-01-24

照片:大卫·古特曼

对于马勒的作品而言,老问题依然存在。演出,即使是未完成的第十交响曲,也变得如此频繁,以至于很难重现它们曾经带来的兴奋。无论经过修改还是保留原貌,德里克·库克演奏的马勒五乐章主体部分,近来似乎有望超越马勒最接近完成的柔板乐章的独立演奏版本。在此背景下,弗拉基米尔·尤罗夫斯基决定以鲁道夫·巴尔沙伊的版本完成他个人(大致按时间顺序)的马勒研究之旅,这有力地提醒我们,没有绝对的答案。第十交响曲是一部“未完成的作品”。指挥家完全有权利进行创新,当他高举乐谱时,现场响起了热烈的掌声。