音乐会评论 2021-12-15 / 10 分钟

马修·伯恩斯《胡桃夹子》;阿什利·肖;公主糖业公司。摄影:约翰·佩尔松

There are dozens upon dozens of versions of

# 音乐会评论 # 伦敦萨德勒之井剧院 # GJ Dowler
马修·伯恩斯《胡桃夹子》;阿什利·肖;公主糖业公司。摄影:约翰·佩尔松
There are dozens upon dozens of versions of
The Nutcracker
but only a handful are truly successful visions of Tchaikovsky’s magnificent score – in the classical world Peter Wright’s productions stand tall and in ‘modern’ dance Mark Morris’s
The Hard Nut
is a classic. That exclusive list also includes Matthew Bourne’s
Nutcracker!
, now celebrating its thirtieth anniversary with a seasonal sojourn at Sadler’s Wells in a refreshed version. Quite simply, it is a delight. The combination of the music, played with dash and verve by a smallish orchestra under Brett Morris, Anthony Ward’s splendid designs and Bourne’s own unflagging scenic and choreographic invention, make for the most enjoyable of evenings out.
From the first moments as the children of Dr Dross’s Orphanage for Waifs and Strays (played by adult dancers) emerge one by one from the wings and look with varying emotions at the audience, one sits back in the knowledge that this is going to be fun. And it most certainly is. If anything, Bourne has pulled off the ultimate challenge of making the first Act of
Nutcracker
interesting – he gives his cast so much to do in terms of dancing, movement, characterisation, incident and narrative, that one enters wholly into this fantasy world peopled with grotesques.
The cast-members live up to their director’s demands, coalescing into a coherent ensemble without sacrificing their own personalities and movement idiosyncrasies. Daisy May Kemp is the most chilling of matrons, a toxic blend of Cruella de Vil and Nurse Ratched, while Danny Reuben’s oleaginous Dr Dross slithers his sycophantic way around the orphanage’s governors before cruelly disposing of the moth-eaten Christmas tree out of a window once they are gone. Delicious. Their brattish daughter and son Sugar and Fritz are played to the full by Cordelia Braithwaite and Dominic North, ever unable to resist the urge to bully the orphans who must pay them court.
Bourne and Ward save
coups de théâtre
a-plenty for the ‘transformation’, the details of which our critic will omit to detail in case the reader is yet to see them. Suffice to say that the swell of Tchaikovsky’s music is matched scenically with a scenario and stage-picture which are not a little unsettling, the stuff of children’s nightmarish fantasy. Indeed, it is this aspect of
Nutcracker!
which lies at the heart of its success: Bourne and his collaborators have succeeded in blending the joyousness of childhood with the stirrings of adolescence, innocent delights with burgeoning sexual desire. This piece becomes Clara’s fantasy, full of her first love for the Nutcracker, but is at times peopled with multiple copies of him, bare-chested, strong-thighed men who flex their muscles and glory in their masculinity. Of course, this being Bourne, it is all sent up magnificently, but it is still there. Equally, in Sweetieland, the sweets are perhaps the most lascivious pick-and-mix selection one could imagine – everything, and indeed, everyone is edible, which leads to more stroking and licking than could otherwise be conceived in a family show; sugared bottoms are wiggled, candy crotches thrust and sugar-rush leers duly delivered. In the hands of another, it could all tip over into something else, but Bourne is sure-handed in his treatment and it remains on the right side of the line.
The ‘lead’ quartet are magnificent, experienced Bourne performers all, from Ashley Shaw’s Sugar who progresses from Baby Jane to
femme fatale
and Dominic North’s capricious, sexually lascivious Fritz, a brilliantly naughty portrayal, to Cordelia Braithwaite’s much put-upon but utterly delightful Clara and Harrison Dowzell’s hunk Nutcracker, whose Act II solo shows what a really good dancer he is. Jonathon Luke Baker plays a predatory Knickerbocker Glory, part Terry-Thomas, part Lewis Carroll’s Caterpillar and Monique Jonas is a deeply sultry Allsort – two dancers in a universally good company.
Nutcracker!
is one of Bourne’s best works, not least because he shows equal invention in ensemble work as in solo and duet – nowhere is this more apparent than in the Frozen Lake section which closes the first Act. Here he combines a homage to Frederick Ashton’s ballet
Les Patineurs
with Sonja Henie’s ice-dance film spectaculars of the 1930s and 40s in a truly satisfying
pas d’action
.
Nutcracker!
succeeds on every level, satisfying the ballet-goer with its numerous references to the genre and extended dance sections as much as the theatre-goer with a clear and fast-moving narrative and sure sense of scenic effect. As a show in difficult times, it is hard to think of anything which is more enjoyable.
最新资讯

更多资讯

查看全部资讯
蒂恰蒂指挥库勒沃。照片:大卫·古特曼
音乐会评论 2026-03-25

蒂恰蒂指挥库勒沃。照片:大卫·古特曼

宣传语不仅承诺呈现“原汁原味的西贝柳斯”,还称其为“芬兰当代最具原创性的年轻声音之一”。人们不禁好奇,洛塔·温纳科斯基(Lotta Wennäkoski)听到这样的评价是感到荣幸还是不悦。这位年过五十的成熟音乐家,曾为2017年逍遥音乐会最后一晚创作了一首令人惊艳的迷你序曲《褶边》(Flounce)。这首作品随后被收录在一张个人作曲家管弦乐专辑中,并最终荣获留声机奖。

库尔特·魏尔——马哈戈尼城的兴衰
音乐会评论 2026-02-16

库尔特·魏尔——马哈戈尼城的兴衰

他的新作 在缓慢的开场之后,逐渐展现出类似的原始能量。除了营造出一种工业废墟般的氛围之外,几乎没有其他布景,一个充满无限可能的世界正等待着被倾泻而出。一个巧妙的构思是,三位主角乘坐一辆集装箱卡车抵达,卡车随后卸下人员和道具,同时也容纳了更为私密的场景。我们并非置身于20世纪20年代的柏林或狂野的西部,而是一个色彩艳丽、极尽夸张的当代世界。正如当代对抗性社会主义艺术作品中常见的情况一样,焦点逐渐滑向了非政治的虚无主义。既然我们已经把世界糟蹋得不成样子,谁还需要飓风的帮助?没钱比谋杀更可怕。但为什么会这样呢?曼顿摒弃了辩证法,转而依靠令人难忘的视觉效果来填充剧院的广阔空间,呈现出一场阴郁的巡游。标语横幅毫无意义,而即将到来的台风却仅用一盏摇曳的灯笼和一位踢踏舞者(亚当·泰勒,莉齐·吉编舞)就生动地展现出来。不出所料,布莱希特笔下的性工作者不再全是女性,绞刑架也被电椅取代。一些解说员从通常供观众使用的包厢里发出声音。灯光设计至关重要,有时甚至达到了精妙绝伦的效果。

照片:大卫·古特曼
音乐会评论 2026-02-07

照片:大卫·古特曼

指挥简短的致辞,解释了中场休息时间与印刷节目单上所列时间不同,同时也引出了维捷斯拉娃·卡普拉洛娃(1915-1940)的作品。作为马蒂努的学生(甚至更多),她的音乐同样繁复而躁动,但却难以令人信服地展现出,如果她没有英年早逝,或许会成为上世纪的一位杰出作曲家。至少今晚的演出给人的感觉是喜忧参半。《 乡村组曲》 原本充满活力和色彩,却因乐曲的跳跃性而显得有些失衡,其中穿插着对 《彼得鲁什卡》 和 《大海》的回忆,以及更为明显的民间音乐元素(巴托克式的?),争夺着主导地位。雅纳切克式的“军事”风格最为突出(卡普拉洛娃此前曾创作过自己的 《军事小交响曲》)。 组曲的慢乐章,起初让人联想到英国田园诗和斯美塔那,但持续时间过长。后来,卡普拉洛娃的《 挥手告别》 ——一首篇幅较长的管弦乐歌曲,带有浓郁的晚期浪漫主义氛围,令人想起科恩戈尔德——被安排在幕间休息前演出。这些差异是否注定会成为卡普拉洛娃风格的一部分?它们是否正是其风格的精髓所在?我们永远不得而知。

照片:大卫·古特曼
音乐会评论 2026-02-04

照片:大卫·古特曼

伦敦爱乐乐团本乐季的两场音乐会巧妙地联系在一起,这种营销策略虽然在地理位置上有些牵强,但却十分精妙。这是第一场:四首来自中欧和东欧的20世纪作品,用流行音乐来类比的话,这些作品近年来又重新流行起来。

照片:大卫·古特曼
音乐会评论 2026-02-03

照片:大卫·古特曼

皇家爱乐乐团近来势头强劲,尽管演出中不时传来一些杂音:支气管咳嗽声、手机铃声、空调的嗡嗡声,以及偶尔掉落的玻璃杯,但演奏者和观众的热情依然溢于言表。佩特连科以他一贯用略带口音的英语进行的一番精心准备的背景介绍开场,这口音听起来颇为可爱,就像乔治·索尔蒂爵士一样,似乎并未受到长期居住在英国的影响。今晚的演出最终传递的信息,是在当下黑暗中带来希望。

照片:大卫·古特曼
音乐会评论 2026-01-24

照片:大卫·古特曼

对于马勒的作品而言,老问题依然存在。演出,即使是未完成的第十交响曲,也变得如此频繁,以至于很难重现它们曾经带来的兴奋。无论经过修改还是保留原貌,德里克·库克演奏的马勒五乐章主体部分,近来似乎有望超越马勒最接近完成的柔板乐章的独立演奏版本。在此背景下,弗拉基米尔·尤罗夫斯基决定以鲁道夫·巴尔沙伊的版本完成他个人(大致按时间顺序)的马勒研究之旅,这有力地提醒我们,没有绝对的答案。第十交响曲是一部“未完成的作品”。指挥家完全有权利进行创新,当他高举乐谱时,现场响起了热烈的掌声。