音乐会评论 2024-08-14 / 12 分钟

关于此网页

Bianca e Falliero

# 音乐会评论
关于此网页
Bianca e Falliero
(1819) is one of the operas Rossini composed during his period in Naples, but is set in Venice, and was actually premiered at La Scala (Milan). Its narrative is a standard formula of conflicted personal and public loyalties, as the lovers of the title are opposed by Bianca’s father – although Falliero has heroically seen off a Spanish force that threatened the Venetian republic, Contareno (a state senator) wants Bianca to marry another senator, Capellio, to overcome the difference between their families, and because the latter is rich (unlike Falliero).
The fact of the opera’s plot and Rossini’s sticking to the standard slow-moving form of
opera seria
(rather than experimenting with a more fluid or varied structure as he did with his other Neapolitan operas) is fair game for director Jean-Louis Grinda to expose the mechanics of the composer’s dramatic art, as he explains in the programme, seeing that it chimes in less with our greater expectations as to dramatic realism in the present day. Grinda’s idea doesn’t result in anything very radical or probing in terms of Rossini’s operatic style specifically, and is best read as a general pealing back of operatic conventions – especially those of
opera seria
(let’s say from the period of Alessandro Scarlatti to Rossini’s own, last example,
Semiramide
) which are founded upon the rigid sequence of arias (and other solo numbers) and recitatives (the latter, in
Bianca e Falliero
, are still largely scored for pianoforte continuo, rather than orchestral accompaniment). Here, that approach means having the (relatively few) scene changes carried out in full view of the audience, as a graphic way of marking the manner in which those recitatives serve as the (somewhat artificial) shift in gear, or palate cleanser, between strongly contrasting arias on either side of them. For better or worse, the changes here are brief anyway, as the set is not complicated and certainly not a lavish design as was typical of the early 19
th
century. Choreography tends to be fairly static (as it was in Rossini’s time, even if the protocol of theatrical gestures from then are not utilised here); and a standard Brechtian ‘alienation’ effect is achieved by having Bianca’s confidant Costanza conduct the chorus of servants as an ensemble of chambermaids on stage.
The setting is brought forwards from the 17
th
century to the 1950s or ’60s, which no longer really makes sense of the Venetian context since it had vanished as an independent state long before that, but nor is any other particular place evoked in the plain marquetry of the set, or the video footage of people in commotion, running through the streets of an unspecified Italian town centre – though it certainly isn’t Venice. That city is only summoned up in the backdrops – a view across to San Giorgio Maggiore for Act One (which at least, therefore, positions the action correctly from this perspective, on St Mark’s Square or the Doge’s Palace) and a general vista of one of the main waterfronts for Act Two.
The one respect in which Grinda does engage with the specific material of this opera is that its librettist, Felice Romani, revised the tragic ending of the play on which it is based and gave it a happy conclusion instead, so that Bianca’s father relents, and Capellio exercises compassion, enabling her union with Falliero. Grinda has his cake and eats it by having Bianca sing the music for the triumphant ending (which re-uses the concluding rondo of
La donna del lago
) but in a self-absorbed delirium or fantasy, while the other characters remain essentially frozen, leading us to believe that Bianca merely entertains a delusion, and there is no reprieve for her after all (or Falliero, who will be condemned by the Council for treachery). That would explain why Bianca is shadowed for much of the time that she is on stage by an elderly blind woman – evidently her future self, disappointed and infirm. It’s a clever idea, even more so as it also seems to engage, almost in reverse, with the Rossini Opera Festival’s previous production of the work which also had it both ways and presented both endings – the bad one as Bianca’s nightmare, before her triumph wins out. But with nearly three hours of music, it’s a long haul before Grinda’s dramatic irony is unravelled.
The singers more than meet the challenge of the music, not least the performances from the two title characters. Both grow into their respective parts during the course of the drama, Jessica Pratt delivering finely chiselled
coloratura
and Aya Wakizono, in the trouser role of Falliero, evincing a tone of cool ardour and keeping her calm even as it becomes apparent that Bianca is to marry Capiello. But more fire comes to each of their interpretations in Act Two, as Pratt avails herself of more hefty vocal volleys and some impressively held top Ds or Es, and Wakizono also achieves a more assertive musical presence and striking high notes of her own for the contralto part.
Dmitry Korchak proves to be a versatile Contareno – frequently vociferous when asserting paternal authority over Bianca, sometimes to the point of aggression and roughness, but he also finds a more lyrically persuasive demeanour too. Although Capellio receives no aria of his own, Giorgi Manoshvili makes a vividly sonorous impression in the role, thoughtful and earnest where Contareno is more impetuous. Carmen Buendía brings charisma in the even smaller role of Costanza.
In quite a long opera Roberto Abbado steers a dependable course through the music. It sets a judicious pace which allows the vocal lines to unfold with due clarity and the Chorus of the Teatro Ventidio Basso to emerge luminously, while also spotlighting some fine instrumental solos from within the RAI National Symphony Orchestra. If the production sometimes lags, the musical interpretation certainly sustains tension and interest of its own.
最新资讯

更多资讯

查看全部资讯
蒂恰蒂指挥库勒沃。照片:大卫·古特曼
音乐会评论 2026-03-25

蒂恰蒂指挥库勒沃。照片:大卫·古特曼

宣传语不仅承诺呈现“原汁原味的西贝柳斯”,还称其为“芬兰当代最具原创性的年轻声音之一”。人们不禁好奇,洛塔·温纳科斯基(Lotta Wennäkoski)听到这样的评价是感到荣幸还是不悦。这位年过五十的成熟音乐家,曾为2017年逍遥音乐会最后一晚创作了一首令人惊艳的迷你序曲《褶边》(Flounce)。这首作品随后被收录在一张个人作曲家管弦乐专辑中,并最终荣获留声机奖。

库尔特·魏尔——马哈戈尼城的兴衰
音乐会评论 2026-02-16

库尔特·魏尔——马哈戈尼城的兴衰

他的新作 在缓慢的开场之后,逐渐展现出类似的原始能量。除了营造出一种工业废墟般的氛围之外,几乎没有其他布景,一个充满无限可能的世界正等待着被倾泻而出。一个巧妙的构思是,三位主角乘坐一辆集装箱卡车抵达,卡车随后卸下人员和道具,同时也容纳了更为私密的场景。我们并非置身于20世纪20年代的柏林或狂野的西部,而是一个色彩艳丽、极尽夸张的当代世界。正如当代对抗性社会主义艺术作品中常见的情况一样,焦点逐渐滑向了非政治的虚无主义。既然我们已经把世界糟蹋得不成样子,谁还需要飓风的帮助?没钱比谋杀更可怕。但为什么会这样呢?曼顿摒弃了辩证法,转而依靠令人难忘的视觉效果来填充剧院的广阔空间,呈现出一场阴郁的巡游。标语横幅毫无意义,而即将到来的台风却仅用一盏摇曳的灯笼和一位踢踏舞者(亚当·泰勒,莉齐·吉编舞)就生动地展现出来。不出所料,布莱希特笔下的性工作者不再全是女性,绞刑架也被电椅取代。一些解说员从通常供观众使用的包厢里发出声音。灯光设计至关重要,有时甚至达到了精妙绝伦的效果。

照片:大卫·古特曼
音乐会评论 2026-02-07

照片:大卫·古特曼

指挥简短的致辞,解释了中场休息时间与印刷节目单上所列时间不同,同时也引出了维捷斯拉娃·卡普拉洛娃(1915-1940)的作品。作为马蒂努的学生(甚至更多),她的音乐同样繁复而躁动,但却难以令人信服地展现出,如果她没有英年早逝,或许会成为上世纪的一位杰出作曲家。至少今晚的演出给人的感觉是喜忧参半。《 乡村组曲》 原本充满活力和色彩,却因乐曲的跳跃性而显得有些失衡,其中穿插着对 《彼得鲁什卡》 和 《大海》的回忆,以及更为明显的民间音乐元素(巴托克式的?),争夺着主导地位。雅纳切克式的“军事”风格最为突出(卡普拉洛娃此前曾创作过自己的 《军事小交响曲》)。 组曲的慢乐章,起初让人联想到英国田园诗和斯美塔那,但持续时间过长。后来,卡普拉洛娃的《 挥手告别》 ——一首篇幅较长的管弦乐歌曲,带有浓郁的晚期浪漫主义氛围,令人想起科恩戈尔德——被安排在幕间休息前演出。这些差异是否注定会成为卡普拉洛娃风格的一部分?它们是否正是其风格的精髓所在?我们永远不得而知。

照片:大卫·古特曼
音乐会评论 2026-02-04

照片:大卫·古特曼

伦敦爱乐乐团本乐季的两场音乐会巧妙地联系在一起,这种营销策略虽然在地理位置上有些牵强,但却十分精妙。这是第一场:四首来自中欧和东欧的20世纪作品,用流行音乐来类比的话,这些作品近年来又重新流行起来。

照片:大卫·古特曼
音乐会评论 2026-02-03

照片:大卫·古特曼

皇家爱乐乐团近来势头强劲,尽管演出中不时传来一些杂音:支气管咳嗽声、手机铃声、空调的嗡嗡声,以及偶尔掉落的玻璃杯,但演奏者和观众的热情依然溢于言表。佩特连科以他一贯用略带口音的英语进行的一番精心准备的背景介绍开场,这口音听起来颇为可爱,就像乔治·索尔蒂爵士一样,似乎并未受到长期居住在英国的影响。今晚的演出最终传递的信息,是在当下黑暗中带来希望。

照片:大卫·古特曼
音乐会评论 2026-01-24

照片:大卫·古特曼

对于马勒的作品而言,老问题依然存在。演出,即使是未完成的第十交响曲,也变得如此频繁,以至于很难重现它们曾经带来的兴奋。无论经过修改还是保留原貌,德里克·库克演奏的马勒五乐章主体部分,近来似乎有望超越马勒最接近完成的柔板乐章的独立演奏版本。在此背景下,弗拉基米尔·尤罗夫斯基决定以鲁道夫·巴尔沙伊的版本完成他个人(大致按时间顺序)的马勒研究之旅,这有力地提醒我们,没有绝对的答案。第十交响曲是一部“未完成的作品”。指挥家完全有权利进行创新,当他高举乐谱时,现场响起了热烈的掌声。