音乐会评论 2024-10-24 / 13 分钟

关于此网页

Such is the dramatic vitality of Verdi’s

# 音乐会评论
关于此网页
Such is the dramatic vitality of Verdi’s
Rigoletto
that there is already a sense that it presents a metatheatre of a corrupt, cruel world, embodied in microcosm in the Duke of Mantua’s court. In her new production for Welsh National Opera, Adele Thomas perceptively emphasises those elements, to underline the title character’s tragedy, by virtuosically weaving several theatrical and visual strands together.
Noting Verdi’s high regard for Shakespeare, and the fact that he was contemplating an opera on
King Lear
around the time he composed
Rigoletto
– as well as both scenarios featuring a prominent role for a jester – Thomas draws upon the sartorial style and vengeful, violent themes of Jacobean tragedy for the principal characters. The rest of the debauched court is cast as a sordidly Hogarthian scene from the 18
th
century, in which self-serving, gluttonous abandon prevails. In both cases the courtiers’ deliberately dishevelled appearance, as though sinister pantomime characters, echoes their moral shabbiness, and there is also a hint of the contemporary work by Cold War Steve, lampooning the degradation and decadence of the past 14 years of Tory rule, even if the only specific reference to that period is the head of a roasted pig, recalling the one upon which David Cameron is said to have performed unspeakable acts at a student shindig. All that seems to be missing from the orgy of sordid pleasures to make it really up to date is pink cocaine. Guests eat out of the creature’s entrails, and the wanton depravity depicted in other Jacobean tragedies is mimicked in the violence meted out upon Monterone (here a despised Puritan preacher) and in the slitting of Giovanna’s throat, all presaging the murder which Sparafucile and Maddalena will perpetrate upon Gilda.
The bare tiled set for most of the action presumably evokes the nihilistic, God-abandoned world of which Thomas speaks in her programme note in relation to Jacobean drama, as does the simple, lurid blood-red chamber for the inn where the Duke disports himself in Act Three with Maddalena, set within a dark, empty space beyond. Despite Gilda’s death – which is usually considered to be the means to the Duke’s redemption – here it feels as though he will continue his amoral life, none the wiser for his encounter with such a saint, and probably will find nothing better to do than write his self-justifying memoirs for a healthy financial advance.
Consistent with Thomas’s skill in contrapuntally combining several ideas at once, those settings not only enhance the innate theatricality of the production, but they also relate to her third inspiration, the 18
th
century Venetian painting
Exhibition of a Rhinoceros
by Pietro Longhi, in which the helpless and inert, but noble beast is leered at by absurdly dressed carnival revellers. So it is that Rigoletto is foregrounded in the production and made the focus of the court’s – and our – voyeuristic attention. Stage lights are prominently lined up at both sides as though his tragedy is played out as entertainment for the courtiers, and the lightning for the storm of Act Three comes from within the auditorium around us, as though catching Rigoletto and Gilda in the glare of paparazzi camera lights before our gaze. On two or three occasions, Rigoletto comes upon the action from outside a shabby transparent curtain, on our side of the stage, to encounter the ghostly figure of Sparafucile, drawing Rigoletto on ineluctably to his tragic fate within the court’s arena of cruelty, sealed by Monterone’s curse. Thomas’s fantasy of ideas is rigorously and tautly drawn together; but where, for example, Opera Holland Park’s
Rigoletto
last year was a similar, but entertaining, essay in linking it to political corruption by reinterpreting the scenario specifically as the Bullingdon Club, this is a searing, more general vision of the jester’s suffering as an existential drama.
At the centre of this moral vacuum are arresting, assured performances by Daniel Luis de Vicente and Soraya Mafi in the two lead roles. With music that is usually couched in the form of recitative or arioso, rather than fully-fledged, sustained melody, Rigoletto sometimes seems more like a cipher, caught between the evil of the court and his daughter’s virtue. But de Vicente’s interpretation fleshes out the character with palpable human emotions, from opportunistic goading on of the courtier’s scurrilous behaviour, to warm, impassioned solicitude for Gilda. Mafi’s silvery, agile singing expresses her integrity and purity, but as a fervent young lover rather than a merely ethereal being, and with a nimbleness that matches her performance on stage.
Raffaele Abete’s Duke tends not to be typically romantic in vocal style, his singing coming more from the head than chest, but there’s certainly a florid Italianate colour and garrulousness which captures the Duke’s capricious nature, at least after a muted start. Nathanaël Tavernier and Alyona Abramova offer spectral musical presences as the assassin Sparafucile and Maddalena, his sister and accomplice.
Paul Carey Jones is perhaps more urgent than lugubrious compared with other exponents of Monterone, complementing the simmering, ominous account of the score presided over by Pietro Rizzo, particularly in Act One with hearty contributions from the WNO Chorus. Tension in the WNO Orchestra’s performance eases a little in Act Two, but a quiet determination works itself up for the eerie doom-laden chordal progressions which punctuate Act Three.
With drastic cuts threatening the Orchestra’s livelihood, its players wore sloganed T shirts as part of their ongoing industrial action, and a speech from one of its members urged the audience to sign its petition to protect funding. A gripping
Rigoletto
such as this proves that opera is a huge but worthwhile undertaking whose cultural, intellectual and moral value can’t be measured in vulgar accounting or monetary terms, but which needs the secure, long-term commitment of money and material resources, nonetheless. Otherwise, musical life will surely be reduced to little more than command performances by Taylor Swift at the behest of our new Prime Minister.
最新资讯

更多资讯

查看全部资讯
蒂恰蒂指挥库勒沃。照片:大卫·古特曼
音乐会评论 2026-03-25

蒂恰蒂指挥库勒沃。照片:大卫·古特曼

宣传语不仅承诺呈现“原汁原味的西贝柳斯”,还称其为“芬兰当代最具原创性的年轻声音之一”。人们不禁好奇,洛塔·温纳科斯基(Lotta Wennäkoski)听到这样的评价是感到荣幸还是不悦。这位年过五十的成熟音乐家,曾为2017年逍遥音乐会最后一晚创作了一首令人惊艳的迷你序曲《褶边》(Flounce)。这首作品随后被收录在一张个人作曲家管弦乐专辑中,并最终荣获留声机奖。

库尔特·魏尔——马哈戈尼城的兴衰
音乐会评论 2026-02-16

库尔特·魏尔——马哈戈尼城的兴衰

他的新作 在缓慢的开场之后,逐渐展现出类似的原始能量。除了营造出一种工业废墟般的氛围之外,几乎没有其他布景,一个充满无限可能的世界正等待着被倾泻而出。一个巧妙的构思是,三位主角乘坐一辆集装箱卡车抵达,卡车随后卸下人员和道具,同时也容纳了更为私密的场景。我们并非置身于20世纪20年代的柏林或狂野的西部,而是一个色彩艳丽、极尽夸张的当代世界。正如当代对抗性社会主义艺术作品中常见的情况一样,焦点逐渐滑向了非政治的虚无主义。既然我们已经把世界糟蹋得不成样子,谁还需要飓风的帮助?没钱比谋杀更可怕。但为什么会这样呢?曼顿摒弃了辩证法,转而依靠令人难忘的视觉效果来填充剧院的广阔空间,呈现出一场阴郁的巡游。标语横幅毫无意义,而即将到来的台风却仅用一盏摇曳的灯笼和一位踢踏舞者(亚当·泰勒,莉齐·吉编舞)就生动地展现出来。不出所料,布莱希特笔下的性工作者不再全是女性,绞刑架也被电椅取代。一些解说员从通常供观众使用的包厢里发出声音。灯光设计至关重要,有时甚至达到了精妙绝伦的效果。

照片:大卫·古特曼
音乐会评论 2026-02-07

照片:大卫·古特曼

指挥简短的致辞,解释了中场休息时间与印刷节目单上所列时间不同,同时也引出了维捷斯拉娃·卡普拉洛娃(1915-1940)的作品。作为马蒂努的学生(甚至更多),她的音乐同样繁复而躁动,但却难以令人信服地展现出,如果她没有英年早逝,或许会成为上世纪的一位杰出作曲家。至少今晚的演出给人的感觉是喜忧参半。《 乡村组曲》 原本充满活力和色彩,却因乐曲的跳跃性而显得有些失衡,其中穿插着对 《彼得鲁什卡》 和 《大海》的回忆,以及更为明显的民间音乐元素(巴托克式的?),争夺着主导地位。雅纳切克式的“军事”风格最为突出(卡普拉洛娃此前曾创作过自己的 《军事小交响曲》)。 组曲的慢乐章,起初让人联想到英国田园诗和斯美塔那,但持续时间过长。后来,卡普拉洛娃的《 挥手告别》 ——一首篇幅较长的管弦乐歌曲,带有浓郁的晚期浪漫主义氛围,令人想起科恩戈尔德——被安排在幕间休息前演出。这些差异是否注定会成为卡普拉洛娃风格的一部分?它们是否正是其风格的精髓所在?我们永远不得而知。

照片:大卫·古特曼
音乐会评论 2026-02-04

照片:大卫·古特曼

伦敦爱乐乐团本乐季的两场音乐会巧妙地联系在一起,这种营销策略虽然在地理位置上有些牵强,但却十分精妙。这是第一场:四首来自中欧和东欧的20世纪作品,用流行音乐来类比的话,这些作品近年来又重新流行起来。

照片:大卫·古特曼
音乐会评论 2026-02-03

照片:大卫·古特曼

皇家爱乐乐团近来势头强劲,尽管演出中不时传来一些杂音:支气管咳嗽声、手机铃声、空调的嗡嗡声,以及偶尔掉落的玻璃杯,但演奏者和观众的热情依然溢于言表。佩特连科以他一贯用略带口音的英语进行的一番精心准备的背景介绍开场,这口音听起来颇为可爱,就像乔治·索尔蒂爵士一样,似乎并未受到长期居住在英国的影响。今晚的演出最终传递的信息,是在当下黑暗中带来希望。

照片:大卫·古特曼
音乐会评论 2026-01-24

照片:大卫·古特曼

对于马勒的作品而言,老问题依然存在。演出,即使是未完成的第十交响曲,也变得如此频繁,以至于很难重现它们曾经带来的兴奋。无论经过修改还是保留原貌,德里克·库克演奏的马勒五乐章主体部分,近来似乎有望超越马勒最接近完成的柔板乐章的独立演奏版本。在此背景下,弗拉基米尔·尤罗夫斯基决定以鲁道夫·巴尔沙伊的版本完成他个人(大致按时间顺序)的马勒研究之旅,这有力地提醒我们,没有绝对的答案。第十交响曲是一部“未完成的作品”。指挥家完全有权利进行创新,当他高举乐谱时,现场响起了热烈的掌声。